Choosing among the best super running shoes depends on how you plan to use the plate: race-day speed, demanding workouts, or the long training miles that prepare you for both. In this lineup, the New Balance FuelCell SuperComp Elite V5 is my leading race-day pick for its carbon plate and PEBA-based setup; the Saucony Endorphin Speed 5 makes more sense for runners who want one shoe for a wider range of sessions; and the FuelCell SuperComp Trainer V3 is the training-focused option.
Get workout gear delivered free — and shop member deals
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Access to Prime Big Deal Days deals on October 6–7
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
Those roles matter because a shoe built around a carbon plate and a race-oriented ride can feel less forgiving as an everyday trainer, while a more versatile plated model may give up some of that specialized race-day feel. The product descriptions also vary in detail and include a few specifications that conflict with one another. I base the ranking on the stated materials, plate type, cushioning, and intended use, and I flag uncertainty where the listing does not give a consistent picture. My recommendations focus on running performance and fit for purpose, not casual styling.
Complete the kit
Key Takeaways
Best race-day match: I rank the New Balance FuelCell SuperComp Elite V5 first for runners seeking a carbon-plated road shoe with FuelCell cushioning and a rocker profile.
Best for varied workouts: The Saucony Endorphin Speed 5 uses a semi-rigid nylon plate, giving it a less race-specialized stated setup than the carbon-plated options.
Best training focus: The FuelCell SuperComp Trainer V3 is described for marathon preparation, with a carbon plate and a 4 mm drop.
Best premium-oriented pick: The Endorphin Elite 2 pairs IncrediRUN foam with a slotted carbon plate, though its materials listing conflicts about the upper.
Check the listing carefully: The Endorphin Speed 4 description calls out both a carbon plate and PWRRUN PB, while its specs and foam wording are inconsistent; verify the exact version before choosing it.
| New Balance Men’s FuelCell Supercomp Elite V5 |  | Best Overall for Road Racing | Sole: Rubber | Upper: FantomFit mesh | Midsole: FuelCell with PEBA Energy Arc | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| New Balance Men’s FuelCell Supercomp Trainer V3 |  | Best for Marathon Training | Sole: Rubber | Upper: Mesh | Midsole: FuelCell foam with bio-based content | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Saucony Men’s Endorphin Speed 5 Sneaker |  | Best for Versatile Fast Training | Sole: Rubber | Upper: Engineered mesh | Plate: Full-length semi-rigid nylon | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Saucony Unisex Endorphin Elite 2 Road Running Shoe |  | Best Premium-Oriented Race Pick | Sole: Rubber | Outer material: Leather, per specs; description says knit upper | Inner material: Knit | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Saucony Men’s Endorphin Speed 4 Sneaker |  | Best for Runners Considering an Older Speed Model | Sole: Rubber | Upper: Mesh | Foam: Listing mentions PWRRUN PB and PWRRUN HG; wording is inconsistent | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| super running shoe | Sole | Plate | Upper | Foam |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| New Balance Men’s FuelCell Sup | Rubber | Carbon fiber | FantomFit mesh | — |
| New Balance Men’s FuelCell Sup | Rubber | Carbon fiber with Energy Arc | Mesh | — |
| Saucony Men’s Endorphin Speed | Rubber | Full-length semi-rigid nylon | Engineered mesh | PWRRUN PB |
| Saucony Unisex Endorphin Elite | Rubber | Full-length slotted carbon fiber | — | IncrediRUN |
| Saucony Men’s Endorphin Speed | Rubber | Full-length carbon fiber, per description; verify exact version | Mesh | Listing mentions PWRRUN PB and PWRRUN HG; wording is inconsistent |
More Details on Our Top Picks
New Balance Men’s FuelCell Supercomp Elite V5
The FuelCell SuperComp Elite V5 is my top pick for runners who want a race-focused shoe with a clearly described combination of carbon plate, responsive foam, and rocker geometry. Its FuelCell midsole with PEBA Energy Arc and carbon fiber plate set it apart from the Endorphin Speed 5, which uses a semi-rigid nylon plate. That distinction makes the Elite V5 the more specialized choice on paper, while the Speed 5 looks better suited to a broader rotation of workouts.
The FantomFit mesh upper and lightweight construction are intended to hold the foot securely without adding much bulk. The rocker profile may suit runners who like a rolling sensation through their stride, though geometry that feels smooth to one runner can feel forced to another. The description presents the shoe as versatile across racing, training, road, and track use, but I would still reserve a plated race model for the sessions where its ride makes sense rather than assuming it will replace every daily trainer.
There are tradeoffs. The listing says the support features may need a break-in period, so runners wanting a soft, familiar feel straight out of the box should be cautious. It also gives no specific drop or weight, which makes comparison with the 4 mm Trainer V3 and 8 mm Endorphin models harder. I rank it first because its intended race role and core platform are the clearest in this set, not because every runner will prefer its fit or firmness.
Pros:- Carbon fiber plate and rocker profile are aimed at efficient race-day turnover.
- FuelCell with PEBA Energy Arc gives it a distinct race-oriented platform.
- FantomFit mesh upper is designed to provide a light, secure hold.
- The description covers road and track use as well as racing.
Cons:- The supportive construction may need a break-in period.
- Drop and weight are not stated, limiting direct fit and geometry comparisons.
- The listing does not establish how durable the shoe is for frequent daily training.
Best for: Road racers seeking a carbon-plated shoe with FuelCell cushioning and a rocker profile.
Not ideal for: Runners who want a known low-drop or lightweight specification, dislike supportive fits, or need a dependable everyday trainer.
- Sole:Rubber
- Upper:FantomFit mesh
- Midsole:FuelCell with PEBA Energy Arc
- Plate:Carbon fiber
- Geometry:Rocker profile
- Lining:Cotton
- Origin:Imported
Our verdict“I rank the Elite V5 first for its clearly stated carbon-plated race setup, provided its fit and rocker feel suit your stride.”
New Balance Men’s FuelCell Supercomp Trainer V3
For runners building toward a long race, the FuelCell SuperComp Trainer V3 has the clearest training-specific role in this group. Its description names marathon training, a carbon fiber plate, FuelCell foam with bio-based content, and a 4 mm drop. Compared with the Elite V5, it is framed around sustained preparation as well as energy return, rather than primarily pitching itself as a race-day option. That makes it my pick for a runner who wants a plated shoe in a marathon training rotation.
The angular midsole is described as a way to reduce weight, and the outsole is said to offer traction. Together with the plate, those details point toward a structured, forward-moving ride. The 4 mm drop is also a useful comparison point: it is lower than the 8 mm figures listed for the Endorphin models here, so runners accustomed to higher-drop shoes may notice a different loading pattern. A lower drop is not automatically better; familiarity and comfort should guide the choice.
This model comes with less clarity than the Elite V5 on upper construction and overall fit, and the supplied description warns that fit and comfort can vary. It also says the shoe may be less durable for everyday wear, which argues for rotating it with a conventional trainer. I place it second because its marathon-training purpose is specific and useful, but a runner seeking the most explicitly race-focused description may prefer the Elite V5. Those who do not want a plate underfoot should skip both.
Pros:- Marathon training is the stated use, giving it a clear role in this lineup.
- Carbon fiber plate and FuelCell foam are designed to support an energetic ride.
- The 4 mm drop is disclosed for runners comparing shoe geometry.
- Bio-based content is specified in the midsole foam.
Cons:- The description notes that fit and comfort can vary by runner.
- The listing warns that daily wear may reduce durability.
- Weight and detailed upper construction are not provided.
Best for: Marathon trainees looking for a carbon-plated shoe with a stated 4 mm drop and FuelCell cushioning.
Not ideal for: Runners who need a higher-drop fit, prioritize everyday outsole longevity, or prefer an unplated training shoe.
- Sole:Rubber
- Upper:Mesh
- Midsole:FuelCell foam with bio-based content
- Plate:Carbon fiber with Energy Arc
- Drop:4 mm
- Lining:Cotton
- Midsole shape:Angular design
Our verdict“I would choose the Trainer V3 for marathon preparation when a plated, 4 mm-drop ride fits your training needs.”
Saucony Men’s Endorphin Speed 5 Sneaker
The Endorphin Speed 5 is the most versatile-sounding option in the lineup: its description pairs long-distance training with sprints, while its semi-rigid nylon plate sits between an unplated trainer and the carbon-plate models. That makes it a natural choice for runners who want one shoe for tempo sessions, quicker intervals, and some longer runs. By comparison, the SuperComp Trainer V3 is more specifically aimed at marathon preparation, while the Elite V5 has the clearest race-day emphasis.
Saucony pairs PWRRUN PB foam with a full-length groove and reconfigured outsole. The stated aim is a smooth gait transition, and expanded heel coverage suggests added rubber in a wear-prone area. Those details could make the Speed 5 a sensible training partner for someone who wants a propulsive ride without the carbon plate named by the Elite V5 and Trainer V3. The product description calls the fit lightweight and comfortable, but it also acknowledges that the shape may not suit every foot.
The main compromise is specialization. A nylon plate may offer a different, less rigid ride than the carbon construction in the New Balance pair and the listed Elite 2; runners chasing a dedicated race shoe may want one of those instead. There is also little information here about drop, weight, or the exact fit, so trying the shoe or checking fit guidance is a good idea. I give it third place because it appears to cover more workout types, while its specific plate and geometry details are less complete than the top-ranked choices.
Pros:- Semi-rigid nylon plate offers a distinct alternative to the lineup’s carbon plates.
- PWRRUN PB foam is paired with a full-length groove for a smooth ride.
- The description covers both long-distance training and sprints.
- Expanded heel coverage is intended to improve outsole durability.
Cons:- Fit may not suit every foot shape.
- Drop and weight are not supplied for comparison.
- Its training versatility may be less appealing to runners seeking a dedicated carbon-plated racer.
Best for: Runners who want a plated shoe for a mix of long runs, tempo workouts, and faster intervals.
Not ideal for: Racers who specifically want a carbon plate or runners whose feet do not suit Saucony’s stated fit.
- Sole:Rubber
- Upper:Engineered mesh
- Plate:Full-length semi-rigid nylon
- Foam:PWRRUN PB
- Outsole:Reconfigured rubber with expanded heel coverage
- Shaft:Ankle height, per listing
- Ride feature:Full-length groove
Our verdict“I recommend the Speed 5 for varied fast training when versatility matters more than a carbon-plated race-day setup.”
Saucony Unisex Endorphin Elite 2 Road Running Shoe
The Endorphin Elite 2 is the most overtly performance-focused Saucony in this comparison. Its described combination of IncrediRUN foam, a full-length slotted carbon fiber plate, and an 8 mm offset is aimed at a light, responsive road-running ride. Compared with the Endorphin Speed 5, it swaps the semi-rigid nylon plate for carbon and a more specialized cushioning platform; compared with the Elite V5, the supplied details include a named foam and a stated weight.
At 7 oz, it is the only shoe here with a listed weight, which gives a concrete reference for runners focused on keeping race footwear light. The 8 mm offset also contrasts with the Trainer V3’s 4 mm drop. But weight and plate material alone do not establish comfort or speed: fit, running mechanics, and tolerance for a plated ride still matter. This option makes the most sense for a runner who already knows they want a performance-oriented shoe and values its particular foam and plate combination.
I keep it below the first three because the product details contain a meaningful material conflict: the description calls the upper a breathable knit, while the specs say the outer material is leather and the inner material is knit. That mismatch makes the actual upper harder to evaluate. The description also cautions that everyday durability may be limited. Before buying, confirm the exact product version and upper materials in the listing. Its more specialized design is likely a poor match for someone seeking one durable shoe for all weekly miles.
Pros:- IncrediRUN foam is the named cushioning platform.
- Full-length slotted carbon fiber plate is designed for propulsion.
- The listed 7 oz weight and 8 mm offset help with comparisons.
- Knit is specified as the inner material.
Cons:- The listing conflicts on whether the outer material is leather or knit.
- The description says durability may be limited for everyday wear.
- Its specialized plate and cushioning may not suit runners who prefer a conventional trainer.
Best for: Experienced road runners seeking a lightweight shoe with IncrediRUN foam and a slotted carbon plate.
Not ideal for: Buyers who need clearly verified upper materials, a durable everyday trainer, or a less specialized shoe.
- Sole:Rubber
- Outer material:Leather, per specs; description says knit upper
- Inner material:Knit
- Foam:IncrediRUN
- Plate:Full-length slotted carbon fiber
- Offset:8 mm
- Weight:7 oz
Our verdict“I would shortlist the Elite 2 for a lightweight race shoe, after confirming the upper materials in the exact listing.”
Saucony Men’s Endorphin Speed 4 Sneaker
The Endorphin Speed 4 could appeal to runners drawn to a light, responsive Saucony shoe for both racing and training. Its description mentions PWRRUN PB foam, SPEEDROLL technology, a breathable mesh upper, and an 8 mm offset. Those details resemble a versatile performance brief, but the listing also calls out a full-length carbon fiber plate. That claim conflicts with the Speed 5’s explicitly semi-rigid nylon plate and with the supplied Speed 4 foam wording, so I would verify the exact version before treating these as reliable specifications.
Compared with the Speed 5, this model appears more race-oriented in the provided description, with SPEEDROLL and a plate claim that would place it closer to the carbon-plated options. The Speed 5, however, has a clearer account of its plate material and outsole updates. Compared with the Elite V5, the Speed 4 description offers less complete information about its midsole construction and no stated weight. That ambiguity pushes it to the bottom of my ranking despite the promising mix of responsiveness and training use.
The product notes that cushioning may be less suitable for long-distance comfort, which matters if you want a single shoe for extended runs. Its XT-900 carbon rubber outsole is a stated traction detail, but the listing does not describe durability beyond general claims. I would consider the Speed 4 only after confirming whether the exact shoe uses the stated carbon plate and which foam configuration it has. Without that confirmation, the better-documented Speed 5 is the safer choice for a versatile Saucony option.
Pros:- The description pairs SPEEDROLL technology with a responsive ride.
- PWRRUN PB is named in the supplied foam details.
- Breathable mesh upper and 8 mm offset are specified.
- XT-900 carbon rubber is listed for traction.
Cons:- Plate and foam information is inconsistent within the supplied description and specs.
- The listing warns that cushioning may be less suited to long-distance comfort.
- Weight and a clear durability estimate are not provided.
Best for: Runners who want a responsive race-and-training shoe and can confirm the exact plate and foam specifications.
Not ideal for: Buyers who need reliable product details before purchase or prioritize cushioning for long-distance comfort.
- Sole:Rubber
- Upper:Mesh
- Foam:Listing mentions PWRRUN PB and PWRRUN HG; wording is inconsistent
- Plate:Full-length carbon fiber, per description; verify exact version
- Offset:8 mm
- Technology:SPEEDROLL
- Traction:XT-900 carbon rubber
Our verdict“I would choose the Speed 4 only after confirming its plate and foam details, since the Speed 5 is better documented here.”
How We Picked
I ranked these five shoes by how clearly each product’s described design fits a specific super-shoe job: racing, fast training, or marathon preparation. I looked at plate material and construction, cushioning, stated geometry, upper and outsole details, and the intended use in the supplied product information. A carbon plate can create a firmer, more directed feel than a semi-rigid nylon plate, but the shoe’s foam, geometry, fit, and runner all shape the result. I treat those materials as clues to the shoe’s role, not guarantees of speed or comfort.
The ranking favors a clear, specialized road-racing setup at the top, then models with useful distinctions for training and workouts. The Elite V5 leads because its description specifically combines FuelCell cushioning, a PEBA Energy Arc, carbon fiber plate, and rocker profile for racing and training. The Trainer V3 follows as a marathon-training choice. The Endorphin Speed 5 ranks next as the versatile option, with a semi-rigid nylon plate rather than the carbon plates described elsewhere in the lineup.
The Speed 4 and Elite 2 could suit runners looking for a more performance-oriented ride, but their supplied details leave questions: the Speed 4 listing uses inconsistent plate and foam claims, and the Elite 2 description says knit upper while its specs list leather as the outer material. I account for that uncertainty rather than treating every claim as confirmed. I also considered drawbacks that affect a buying decision, including fit variation, possible break-in needs, everyday durability, and limited detail about sizing. Since no verified sizing information or independent testing data is provided, I recommend checking the seller’s exact product version and fit guidance before purchase.
| super running shoe | Upper | Plate | Foam |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Balance Men’s FuelCell Sup | FantomFit mesh | Carbon fiber | — |
| New Balance Men’s FuelCell Sup | Mesh | Carbon fiber with Energy Arc | — |
| Saucony Men’s Endorphin Speed | Engineered mesh | Full-length semi-rigid nylon | PWRRUN PB |
| Saucony Unisex Endorphin Elite | — | Full-length slotted carbon fiber | IncrediRUN |
| Saucony Men’s Endorphin Speed | Mesh | Full-length carbon fiber, per description; verify exact version | Listing mentions PWRRUN PB and PWRRUN HG; wording is inconsistent |
Factors to Consider When Choosing Best Super Running Shoes
I would choose among these shoes by starting with the run they need to serve, then checking plate feel, cushioning, fit, and the reliability of the product details. A shoe with an aggressive race setup can be a poor everyday match, while a more flexible option may suit more training sessions but feel less specialized on race day.
Decide whether you need a racer or a training shoe
If your priority is a road race, I would start with the FuelCell SuperComp Elite V5 or Endorphin Elite 2. Both descriptions specify carbon plates, though the Elite V5 gives a clearer account of its FuelCell and PEBA Energy Arc platform. For regular marathon preparation, the Trainer V3 is explicitly described for training, while the Speed 5 covers a wider range of sessions including sprints and longer runs. Think about how many weekly miles the shoe must cover: a race-focused model may work best as part of a rotation rather than as your only pair.
Understand what the plate distinction tells you
The Speed 5 is the only shoe in this set described with a semi-rigid nylon plate; the other models are presented with carbon fiber plates. That tells me the Speed 5 is positioned differently, but it does not predict an exact feel for every runner. Plate shape, foam, rocker geometry, and your stride all contribute. If you have not run in a plated shoe before, consider how the platform feels during a shorter session before relying on it for a race. Runners who already know they want a carbon-plated setup can compare the Elite V5, Trainer V3, and Elite 2 by purpose and fit.
Compare drop and weight only where the listing provides them
The Trainer V3 lists a 4 mm drop, while the Endorphin Elite 2 and Speed 4 list an 8 mm offset. The Elite 2 is also listed at 7 oz. These figures help distinguish the products, but the other listings do not provide matching measurements, so I would not treat the missing specs as proof that those shoes are heavier or have a particular drop. If you already run comfortably in a certain geometry, favor a shoe that suits that pattern and verify missing details with the retailer or manufacturer.
Treat fit and upper materials as buying criteria
Fit is one of the largest uncertainties in this comparison. The Speed 5 description says its fit may not work for every foot, and the Trainer V3 also notes variation in comfort. The Elite 2 has conflicting upper details: the description says breathable knit, while the specifications list leather as the outer material. I would check the product’s current photos, size guidance, and return terms, and confirm the exact model version. A good plate and foam combination cannot compensate for an upper that rubs or a fit that feels unstable.
Plan for durability and shoe rotation
The Trainer V3 and Elite 2 descriptions both raise concerns about everyday wear, while the Speed 5 specifically mentions expanded heel coverage and a reconfigured outsole. That does not establish a lifespan, but it suggests the shoes are not equally positioned for daily mileage. If you want one pair for every run, the Speed 5’s stated versatility may be appealing; if your priority is racing, rotating a specialized shoe with a conventional trainer can reserve it for key workouts. I would judge outsole wear from your own routes and gait rather than assuming a named rubber compound guarantees longevity.
Verify inconsistent product claims before ordering
Two listings deserve an extra check. The Speed 4 description and specifications do not give a consistent account of its plate and foam, and the Elite 2 listing conflicts on outer material. I would confirm the precise version and material details on the seller’s page before purchase. The Elite V5 and Trainer V3 have clearer plate and midsole descriptions, though both still leave gaps such as weight or fit specifics. Product naming alone is not enough to settle version differences.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which shoe in this comparison is best for race day?
I rank the New Balance FuelCell SuperComp Elite V5 first for road racing because its description clearly names FuelCell cushioning with PEBA Energy Arc, a carbon fiber plate, and rocker geometry. The Endorphin Elite 2 is another race-focused option, with IncrediRUN foam and a slotted carbon plate, but its upper material details conflict. Fit and comfort should decide between them after confirming the exact version.
Which option is best for marathon training?
The FuelCell SuperComp Trainer V3 is the clearest marathon-training pick because that use is stated directly, and the listing gives its 4 mm drop and carbon fiber plate. The Endorphin Speed 5 is a more general fast-training option that also covers longer runs, while the Elite V5 is framed more strongly around racing. I would choose based on whether training mileage or race-day specialization is the main job.
Is the Endorphin Speed 5 a carbon-plated shoe?
The supplied description for the Endorphin Speed 5 specifies a full-length semi-rigid nylon plate. That distinguishes it from the carbon-plated New Balance models and the Elite 2 in this roundup. The Speed 4 listing uses a carbon plate claim, but its details are inconsistent, so I would verify its exact construction before buying.
Can I use a super shoe for every run?
You can use a plated shoe for multiple sessions if it feels comfortable and suits your training, but these listings do not establish that every model is suited to daily wear. The Speed 5 is described for varied training, while the Trainer V3 and Elite 2 listings raise durability concerns for everyday use. I would match the shoe to your mileage, fit, and comfort, and consider rotating a conventional trainer with a race-focused pair.
What should I check before buying one of these shoes?
I would check the fit guidance, exact model version, plate and foam details, and return terms. That matters especially for the Speed 4, whose plate and foam claims are not consistent, and the Elite 2, whose outer material is described as both knit and leather across the supplied information. Also compare the stated geometry: the Trainer V3 lists a 4 mm drop, while the Elite 2 and Speed 4 list an 8 mm offset.
Conclusion
For a race-focused road shoe, I would begin with the New Balance FuelCell SuperComp Elite V5 because its plate, foam, and rocker details are the clearest. Choose the Trainer V3 if marathon preparation is the priority and its 4 mm drop suits you. For one plated shoe across a wider mix of workouts, the Endorphin Speed 5 is the most versatile choice in the descriptions. The Elite 2 may suit runners seeking a light, specialized Saucony racer, but I would confirm its upper materials first. I would approach the Speed 4 only after verifying its exact plate and foam. Across all five, the best match is the one whose fit and ride work for your running—not simply the one with the most race-oriented specifications.
Fall Picks
fall essentials
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
