Among these ASICS running shoes, I’d put the Gel-Nimbus 27 first for runners seeking a plush, cushioned road shoe; the NOVABLAST 5 is the livelier option for energetic daily runs, while the Gel-Kayano 32 adds guidance for runners who prefer a more supported ride. The main tradeoff is between soft protection, a springier feel, and stability—not every runner benefits from the most cushioning or support. For a simpler, more budget-minded road shoe, the Gel-Excite 11 and Gel-Contend 10 are worth comparing, while the Gel-Venture 11 is the trail-specific choice. Read on for how the models differ and which one best fits your running needs.
Get workout gear delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
Complete the kit
Key Takeaways
- Gel-Nimbus 27 leads for cushioned road comfort: It is the strongest all-around fit for runners who prioritize a protective, plush feel over a nimble ride.
- NOVABLAST 5 is the livelier daily trainer: Choose it over the Nimbus when a more energetic ride matters more than maximum softness.
- Gel-Kayano 32 serves a different need from the neutral shoes: Its stability-oriented design suits runners seeking guidance, though others may prefer a less structured feel.
- Gel-Excite 11 and Gel-Contend 10 keep the lineup approachable: They are sensible starting points for uncomplicated road running, with less of the premium cushioning focus of the Nimbus.
- Gel-Venture 11 is the clear surface-specific pick: Its trail purpose makes it a better match for off-road routes than the road-focused models in this comparison.
| ASICS Women’s Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes |  | Best Plush Cushioning for Women | Upper: Engineered jacquard mesh | Upper recycled content: At least 75% | Cushioning: PureGEL and FF BLAST PLUS ECO | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| ASICS Men’s Gel-Venture 11 Trail Running Shoes |  | Best for Trail-to-Daily Versatility | Upper: Mesh | Outsole: Rubber | Closure: Lace-up | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| ASICS Men’s Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes |  | Best Overall for Cushioned Road Miles | Upper: Engineered jacquard mesh | Upper recycled content: At least 75% | Cushioning: PureGEL and FF BLAST PLUS ECO | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| ASICS Men’s Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes |  | Best for Running and Fitness on a Simpler Setup | Upper: Engineered mesh | Cushioning technology: PureGEL and AMPLIFOAM PLUS | Midsole: AMPLIFOAM PLUS with FF BLAST PLUS cushioning | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| ASICS Women’s Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes |  | Best for Breathable, Eco-Minded Comfort | Upper: Engineered jacquard mesh | Cushioning: PureGEL and FF BLAST PLUS ECO | Outsole: Rubber | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| ASICS Women’s NOVABLAST 5 Running Shoes |  | Best for a Bouncy Daily Ride | Upper: Breathable jacquard mesh | Cushioning: FF BLAST MAX | Outsole design: Trampoline-inspired | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| ASICS Women’s Glideride Max Running Shoes |  | Best for Smooth, Guided Strides | Upper: Breathable engineered mesh | Cushioning: FF BLAST MAX and FF BLAST PLUS | Ride technology: GUIDESOLE | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| ASICS Women’s Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes |  | Best for Women’s Stability Support | Upper: Lightweight, breathable engineered mesh | Stability system: 4D GUIDANCE SYSTEM | Gait adaptation: 3D SPACE CONSTRUCTION | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| ASICS Men’s Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes |  | Best for Men’s Supported Long Runs | Upper: Engineered mesh | Heel pull tab: Knit | Stability technology: 4D GUIDANCE SYSTEM | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| ASICS Men’s Gel-Contend 10 Running Shoes |  | Best for a Straightforward Daily Trainer | Upper: Engineered mesh | Rearfoot technology: GEL | Cushioning: AMPLIFOAM PLUS | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| ASICS Women’s Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes |  | Best Entry-Level Cushioning | Technology: PureGEL, AMPLIFOAM PLUS | Sockliner: OrthoLite X-30 | Inner material: Mesh | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| ASICS Men’s Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes |  | Best for Plush, Eco-Minded Comfort | Cushioning technology: PureGEL, FF BLAST PLUS ECO | Upper material: Recycled jacquard mesh | Fabric type: 100% synthetic | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| ASICS Women’s Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes |  | Best for a Smoother, More Responsive Stride | Technology: FF BLAST PLUS, PureGEL | Upper: Engineered mesh | Outsole: FLUIDRIDE | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| ASICS Women’s Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes |  | Best for Ventilated Everyday Wear | Technology: PureGEL, AMPLIFOAM PLUS | Upper: Engineered mesh | Sockliner: OrthoLite X-30 | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| ASICS Men’s NOVABLAST 5 Running Shoes |  | Best for an Energetic Ride | Midsole: FF BLAST MAX cushioning | Outsole: AHAR LO rubber | Upper material: Synthetic fiber | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| asics running shoe | Upper | Origin | Inner material | Outer material |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASICS Women’s Gel-Nimbus 27 Ru | Engineered jacquard mesh | Imported | Polyester | — |
| ASICS Men’s Gel-Venture 11 Tra | Mesh | — | — | — |
| ASICS Men’s Gel-Nimbus 27 Runn | Engineered jacquard mesh | Imported | Polyester and ethylene vinyl acetate | — |
| ASICS Men’s Gel-Excite 11 Runn | Engineered mesh | — | Polyester | — |
| ASICS Women’s Gel-Nimbus 27 Ru | Engineered jacquard mesh | Imported | Polyester | Mesh |
| ASICS Women’s NOVABLAST 5 Runn | Breathable jacquard mesh | Imported | Polyester | Synthetic fiber |
| ASICS Women’s Glideride Max Ru | Breathable engineered mesh | Imported | — | Polyurethane (PU) |
| ASICS Women’s Gel-Kayano 32 Ru | Lightweight, breathable engineered mesh | — | — | — |
| ASICS Men’s Gel-Kayano 32 Runn | Engineered mesh | Imported | Polyester | Synthetic fiber |
| ASICS Men’s Gel-Contend 10 Run | Engineered mesh | Imported | Polyester | Synthetic fiber |
| ASICS Women’s Gel-Excite 11 Ru | — | Imported | Mesh | Synthetic fiber |
| ASICS Men’s Gel-Nimbus 27 Runn | — | Imported | — | Polyester |
| ASICS Women’s Gel-Cumulus 27 R | Engineered mesh | Imported | Polyester | Synthetic fiber |
| ASICS Women’s Gel-Excite 11 Ru | Engineered mesh | Imported | Mesh | Polyurethane (PU) |
| ASICS Men’s NOVABLAST 5 Runnin | — | — | — | — |
More Details on Our Top Picks
ASICS Women’s Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes
I’d choose this women’s Gel-Nimbus 27 for runners who want soft, cushioned landings for regular road miles. Its PureGEL and FF BLAST PLUS ECO pairing is geared toward absorbing impact while keeping toe-offs responsive, so it offers a more comfort-focused ride than the lighter, more straightforward Gel-Excite 11. The breathable jacquard mesh upper uses at least 75% recycled material, and solution-dyeing reduces water and carbon emissions during production—useful details for buyers who also weigh materials and manufacturing. The tradeoff is that the supplied details don’t establish this shoe as a rugged, high-wear option, and its plush cushioning may be more than runners seeking a firmer, less substantial feel want. I’d shortlist it for road comfort, not rough-trail duty.
Pros:- PureGEL and FF BLAST PLUS ECO cushioning support soft landings and responsive toe-offs
- Breathable engineered jacquard mesh upper
- At least 75% recycled content in the upper
- Solution-dyeing process reduces water and carbon emissions
Cons:- The supplied information does not establish durability for heavy, high-mileage use
- Plush cushioning may not suit runners who prefer a firmer, more direct feel
Best for: Women who run regularly on roads and prefer a soft, cushioned feel underfoot, with recycled materials as an added priority
Not ideal for: Runners focused on rugged trails or a firmer, simpler ride; the product details emphasize plush cushioning rather than trail protection or a firm feel
- Upper:Engineered jacquard mesh
- Upper recycled content:At least 75%
- Cushioning:PureGEL and FF BLAST PLUS ECO
- Outsole:Rubber
- Inner material:Polyester
- Dyeing process:Solution dyeing, reducing water and carbon emissions
- Origin:Imported
Our verdict“Choose this women’s Gel-Nimbus 27 if soft road cushioning and lower-impact upper materials matter more than a firm ride or trail-ready construction.”
ASICS Men’s Gel-Venture 11 Trail Running Shoes
The Gel-Venture 11 is the trail-oriented choice in this group, pairing rearfoot GEL with AMPLIFOAM PLUS cushioning for impact absorption on uneven routes. Its molded rubber outsole gives it a traction-focused purpose that the road-running Gel-Nimbus 27 does not share, while the breathable mesh upper and neutral-pronation design also make it a plausible option for everyday wear. That versatility comes with limits: the product details caution that it may not hold up to very rugged trails, so I wouldn’t treat it as a technical-terrain specialist. The laces may also need adjustment during use. Compared with the cushioned road shoes here, this model makes more sense when route variety and outsole grip matter more than a dedicated road-running feel.
Pros:- Rearfoot GEL and AMPLIFOAM PLUS add impact-absorbing cushioning
- Molded rubber outsole is suited to trail traction
- Breathable mesh upper
- Neutral-pronation design supports a straightforward fit preference
Cons:- May be less durable on very rugged trails
- Laces may need frequent adjustment
- Trail-focused design may be less appealing to buyers seeking a conventional road-running look
Best for: Men who split their time between maintained trails and daily wear and want cushioning with a molded-rubber outsole
Not ideal for: Runners who regularly tackle very rugged trails or want a dedicated, highly specialized trail shoe
- Upper:Mesh
- Outsole:Rubber
- Closure:Lace-up
- Cushioning:AMPLIFOAM PLUS
- Sockliner:OrthoLite Hybrid Max Lite
- GEL technology:Rearfoot GEL
- Pronation design:Neutral
Our verdict“Pick the Gel-Venture 11 for mixed maintained trails and everyday use, but look elsewhere if your routes demand a more rugged trail build.”
ASICS Men’s Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes
For men seeking a comfort-led road shoe, I’d put the Gel-Nimbus 27 ahead of the more basic Gel-Excite 11. PureGEL and FF BLAST PLUS ECO are designed to soften landings and provide a springy toe-off, while the OrthoLite X-55 sockliner adds step-in comfort for runs that extend into all-day wear. The engineered jacquard mesh upper contains at least 75% recycled content, and the cushioning includes about 24% bio-based content, giving this model a more explicit materials story than the supplied Gel-Excite details. The tradeoff is a comfort-first package that may not suit runners who want a firmer, less cushioned ride. The available information also gives little detail about arch-support options, so buyers needing specific support guidance should compare fit carefully.
Pros:- PureGEL and FF BLAST PLUS ECO cushion landings while supporting responsive toe-offs
- OrthoLite X-55 sockliner adds step-in comfort
- Upper contains at least 75% recycled content
- Cushioning includes approximately 24% bio-based content
Cons:- The plush ride may not suit runners seeking a firm, direct feel
- The supplied product information offers limited detail about arch-support options
Best for: Men who want a soft, responsive road-running shoe for regular miles and value recycled and bio-based materials
Not ideal for: Runners who prefer firm underfoot feedback or need clearly specified arch-support options before choosing a shoe
- Upper:Engineered jacquard mesh
- Upper recycled content:At least 75%
- Cushioning:PureGEL and FF BLAST PLUS ECO
- Bio-based cushioning content:Approximately 24%
- Sockliner:OrthoLite X-55
- Outsole:Rubber
- Inner material:Polyester and ethylene vinyl acetate
- Origin:Imported
Our verdict“Choose the men’s Gel-Nimbus 27 for cushioned, responsive road miles and added material-content detail, provided you don’t need a firm ride or specified arch support.”
ASICS Men’s Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes
The Gel-Excite 11 is the practical crossover pick for men who want one pair for runs and general fitness sessions. Its engineered mesh upper supports breathability, while PureGEL and AMPLIFOAM PLUS provide cushioning without the more explicitly plush, eco-material-focused package described for the Gel-Nimbus 27. Reflective details add visibility in lower light, a useful touch for early or late outings. I’d favor it for varied everyday workouts rather than demanding training blocks: the product information flags possible durability limits during intense running, and the fit may run small. Buyers should account for potential sizing changes before committing. Compared with the trail-focused Gel-Venture 11, this is the road-and-fitness option, not the choice for routes where trail traction is the priority.
Pros:- PureGEL and AMPLIFOAM PLUS provide cushioned support
- Engineered mesh upper promotes breathability
- Reflective details support visibility in lower light
- OrthoLite X-30 sockliner and knit heel pull tab add practical comfort details
Cons:- May run small, so the supplied guidance suggests considering a size up
- May be less durable during intense running sessions
Best for: Men who want a breathable shoe for casual road runs, gym sessions, and fitness routines, and can check the fit before buying
Not ideal for: Runners planning intense, high-mileage use or anyone who needs a confirmed true-to-size fit without sizing adjustments
- Upper:Engineered mesh
- Cushioning technology:PureGEL and AMPLIFOAM PLUS
- Midsole:AMPLIFOAM PLUS with FF BLAST PLUS cushioning
- Outsole:Rubber
- Sockliner:OrthoLite X-30
- Inner material:Polyester
- Visibility details:Reflective details
- Heel feature:Knit heel pull tab
Our verdict“Choose the Gel-Excite 11 for casual running and fitness versatility, but check sizing and avoid relying on it for demanding, high-mileage training.”
ASICS Women’s Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes
This women’s Gel-Nimbus 27 is a strong match for buyers who put breathable comfort and lower-impact materials near the top of their list. The jacquard mesh upper and PureGEL with FF BLAST PLUS ECO cushioning are intended to combine airflow with softer landings, giving it a more comfort-first profile than the Gel-Excite 11, whose supplied details emphasize everyday running and fitness versatility. The product information also points to sustainable manufacturing processes, although it does not specify recycled-content percentages or the particular processes as clearly as the other women’s Nimbus listing. That makes this version harder to compare on exact material claims. Its cushioning is appealing for comfortable road miles, but the supplied notes flag a possible break-in period and less durability than heavier shoes.
Pros:- Breathable engineered jacquard mesh upper
- PureGEL and FF BLAST PLUS ECO cushioning support comfortable landings
- Lightweight cushioning is suited to comfort-focused running
- Product description identifies eco-friendly materials and manufacturing processes
Cons:- May require a break-in period for best comfort
- Product details flag potentially lower durability than heavier shoes
- Sustainability information does not specify recycled-content percentages
Best for: Women who want a breathable, cushioned road shoe and prefer a product described as using eco-friendly materials and manufacturing
Not ideal for: Runners who need detailed sustainability percentages, immediate out-of-box comfort, or a shoe specifically described for heavy use
- Upper:Engineered jacquard mesh
- Cushioning:PureGEL and FF BLAST PLUS ECO
- Outsole:Rubber
- Inner material:Polyester
- Outer material:Mesh
- Origin:Imported
Our verdict“Pick this women’s Gel-Nimbus 27 for breathable, cushioned road comfort with eco-minded materials, but choose another listing if precise sustainability figures are a priority.”
ASICS Women’s NOVABLAST 5 Running Shoes
The NOVABLAST 5 is the lively pick here: its lightweight FF BLAST MAX cushioning and trampoline-inspired outsole aim to add spring to everyday runs. The breathable jacquard mesh helps keep the upper airy, while reflective details are useful for runners heading out in low light. Compared with the Women’s Glideride Max, this model puts its emphasis on a bouncy feel rather than GUIDESOLE-assisted toe-offs. That makes it a stronger match for runners who want an energetic, flexible daily option, not a shoe centered on guided forward motion. Its noticeable design may not suit fans of understated styling, and the supplied details do not establish durability for heavy use. Choose it for a lively ride, but look elsewhere if you prefer a pared-back appearance or prioritize long-term wear evidence.
Pros:- FF BLAST MAX cushioning and trampoline-inspired outsole are designed for a lively, responsive feel.
- Breathable jacquard mesh supports airflow during activity.
- Reflective details add visibility in low-light conditions.
- Lightweight construction suits runners who favor an energetic daily shoe.
Cons:- The distinctive design may not appeal to runners who prefer minimal styling.
- The supplied product information does not establish durability for heavy or high-mileage use.
Best for: Women seeking a lightweight, springy road shoe for regular runs and active wear, especially when they run in low light.
Not ideal for: Runners who prefer discreet styling or need documented durability for frequent, demanding mileage.
- Upper:Breathable jacquard mesh
- Cushioning:FF BLAST MAX
- Outsole design:Trampoline-inspired
- Design features:Tongue wing construction; reflective details
- Sole material:Rubber
- Outer material:Synthetic fiber
- Inner material:Polyester
- Origin:Imported
Our verdict“Choose the NOVABLAST 5 if you want a breathable women’s daily runner with a bouncy feel rather than the Glideride Max’s guided toe-off emphasis.”
ASICS Women’s Glideride Max Running Shoes
The Women’s Glideride Max suits runners who want cushioning paired with a more guided toe-off. Its GUIDESOLE technology is designed to support smooth forward movement, while FF BLAST MAX cushioning and the OrthoLite X-55 sockliner add a soft, comfortable platform. Compared with the Women’s NOVABLAST 5, which foregrounds a trampoline-like bounce, the Glideride Max gives more attention to the mechanics of the stride. That distinction matters if you want an easy-rolling feel rather than a springy one. The tradeoff is a more specialized running design that may feel less versatile for everyday non-running wear; its feature set may also put it above simpler options in cost. I would shortlist it for road runners who value guided transitions and soft step-in comfort.
Pros:- GUIDESOLE technology is designed to support smooth toe-offs.
- FF BLAST MAX cushioning offers an energetic, cushioned ride.
- OrthoLite X-55 sockliner adds soft step-in comfort.
- Engineered mesh upper is breathable.
Cons:- Its running-focused design may be less versatile for casual, non-running use.
- The advanced technology may mean a higher cost than simpler running shoes.
Best for: Women who run regularly and want a cushioned shoe with a guided toe-off and a soft sockliner.
Not ideal for: Buyers seeking one understated shoe mainly for casual wear, or runners who prefer a more freely bouncing ride.
- Upper:Breathable engineered mesh
- Cushioning:FF BLAST MAX and FF BLAST PLUS
- Ride technology:GUIDESOLE
- Sockliner:OrthoLite X-55
- Sole material:Rubber
- Outer material:Polyurethane (PU)
- Origin:Imported
Our verdict“Pick the Glideride Max if guided toe-offs and soft cushioning matter more to you than the NOVABLAST 5’s trampoline-inspired bounce.”
ASICS Women’s Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes
For women who put support ahead of a lively, neutral feel, the Gel-Kayano 32 is the stability-led choice in this group. Its 4D GUIDANCE SYSTEM is designed to respond dynamically during a stride, while 3D SPACE CONSTRUCTION supports compression and gait adaptation. Rearfoot PureGEL cushioning is described as approximately 65% softer than standard GEL, adding a softer landing without making this the same kind of bounce-focused shoe as the Women’s NOVABLAST 5. A breathable engineered mesh upper and knit heel pull tab round out the practical details. The tradeoff is specialization: runners who want a lighter-feeling, less stability-oriented daily option may prefer the NOVABLAST, and the supplied description flags casual wear as a weaker fit.
Pros:- 4D GUIDANCE SYSTEM is designed to provide dynamic stability and support.
- Rearfoot PureGEL offers softer cushioning than standard GEL, according to the supplied product details.
- Breathable engineered mesh upper supports airflow.
- Knit heel pull tab makes the shoe easier to put on.
Cons:- Its specialized stability design may be less appealing for casual wear.
- The advanced support and cushioning make it a more feature-focused choice than basic running shoes.
Best for: Women seeking a supportive, cushioned shoe for long-distance running and who value stability features.
Not ideal for: Runners who prefer a bouncy, less stability-focused ride or want a shoe primarily for casual wear.
- Upper:Lightweight, breathable engineered mesh
- Stability system:4D GUIDANCE SYSTEM
- Gait adaptation:3D SPACE CONSTRUCTION
- Rearfoot cushioning:PureGEL technology
- PureGEL comparison:Approximately 65% softer than standard GEL, according to product details
- Heel detail:Knit heel pull tab
Our verdict“Choose the women’s Gel-Kayano 32 for stability-led long runs; choose the NOVABLAST 5 instead if you want a more bounce-focused ride.”
ASICS Men’s Gel-Kayano 32 Running Shoes
The men’s Gel-Kayano 32 is the lineup’s support-oriented pick for runners who want stability alongside cushioning. Its 4D GUIDANCE SYSTEM is designed to help support the stride dynamically, while rearfoot PureGEL and FF BLAST PLUS combine cushioning with a responsive element. Against the Men’s NOVABLAST 5, which centers a springy, trampoline-inspired ride, the Kayano is the clearer option for buyers prioritizing structured support over bounce. The engineered mesh upper keeps the build breathable, and the knit heel tab helps with entry. The tradeoffs are its specialized focus and possible durability limits during intense training, both noted in the product details. It may also cost more than a basic trainer, so runners who want a simpler everyday shoe can look to the Gel-Contend 10.
Pros:- 4D GUIDANCE SYSTEM adds a stability-focused design.
- Rearfoot PureGEL and FF BLAST PLUS provide a cushioned, responsive combination.
- Engineered mesh upper is lightweight and breathable.
- Knit heel pull tab supports easier entry.
Cons:- The product information notes that durability may be limited for intense training.
- Its support-focused design may be more specialized than a basic daily shoe.
- The feature set may cost more than simpler options such as the Gel-Contend 10.
Best for: Men who want a breathable, stability-focused shoe with cushioning for regular and long-distance road runs.
Not ideal for: Runners seeking a basic, less specialized trainer, or those planning intense use where the stated durability concern matters.
- Upper:Engineered mesh
- Heel pull tab:Knit
- Stability technology:4D GUIDANCE SYSTEM
- Rearfoot cushioning:PureGEL
- Foam cushioning:FF BLAST PLUS
- Sole material:Rubber
- Outer material:Synthetic fiber
- Inner material:Polyester
- Origin:Imported
Our verdict“Choose the men’s Gel-Kayano 32 for stability-led runs, but favor the Gel-Contend 10 if you want a simpler, less specialized trainer.”
ASICS Men’s Gel-Contend 10 Running Shoes
The Men’s Gel-Contend 10 is the straightforward cushioning option for runners who do not need the more specialized ride of the Kayano or Glideride models. Rearfoot GEL technology is intended to absorb shock, while AMPLIFOAM PLUS and an OrthoLite sockliner add comfort for runs and everyday activity. Compared with the Men’s Gel-Kayano 32, it has no listed 4D GUIDANCE SYSTEM, so it is better suited to buyers seeking basic cushioning rather than a stability-led design. Its engineered mesh upper is lightweight and breathable, but the product details warn that durability may be limited for intense use. Sizing may also vary, which makes fit a point to check carefully. This is the practical pick for less demanding running, not a substitute for a dedicated support shoe.
Pros:- Rearfoot GEL technology is designed to absorb shock.
- AMPLIFOAM PLUS cushioning supports comfort during runs and daily activity.
- OrthoLite sockliner adds comfort and moisture management.
- Lightweight engineered mesh upper is breathable.
Cons:- Product details caution that durability may be limited for intense activities.
- Sizing may vary, so getting the right fit may take care.
- It lacks the listed 4D GUIDANCE SYSTEM found on the Gel-Kayano 32.
Best for: Men looking for a basic cushioned shoe for casual runs and active wear, without a listed stability system.
Not ideal for: Runners doing intense training who need established durability or buyers who require a strongly stability-focused shoe.
- Upper:Engineered mesh
- Rearfoot technology:GEL
- Cushioning:AMPLIFOAM PLUS
- Sockliner:OrthoLite
- Sole material:Rubber
- Outer material:Synthetic fiber
- Inner material:Polyester
- Origin:Imported
Our verdict“Choose the Gel-Contend 10 for uncomplicated cushioning and everyday activity, but opt for the Gel-Kayano 32 if you need listed stability support.”
ASICS Women’s Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes
The Gel-Excite 11 makes sense for runners who want a comfortable everyday shoe without the more elaborate cushioning setup of the Gel-Nimbus 27. Its AMPLIFOAM PLUS midsole and PureGEL technology are aimed at softening landings, while the lightweight mesh upper helps keep the fit breathable on routine runs and walks. The OrthoLite X-30 sockliner adds moisture management, a useful touch for regular wear. Reflective details also help with visibility when a run starts or ends in dim light. Compared with the more performance-focused Gel-Cumulus 27, this model puts a simpler, comfort-first ride ahead of a livelier stride. The tradeoff is that the supplied information gives less reason to choose it for demanding training or runners seeking a highly responsive feel; intense use may also test its durability.
Pros:- PureGEL and AMPLIFOAM PLUS cushioning soften the ride
- Lightweight mesh upper supports ventilation
- OrthoLite X-30 sockliner helps manage moisture
- Reflective details aid visibility in low light
Cons:- May not hold up as well to intense training
- Less performance-oriented cushioning profile than the Gel-Cumulus 27
Best for: Women beginning a running routine or mixing short, easy runs with daily walking who want breathable cushioning and a moisture-managing sockliner.
Not ideal for: Runners logging demanding, high-intensity training or seeking a more responsive ride; the Gel-Cumulus 27 is the stronger comparison for a livelier cushioning setup.
- Technology:PureGEL, AMPLIFOAM PLUS
- Sockliner:OrthoLite X-30
- Inner material:Mesh
- Outer material:Synthetic fiber
- Sole material:Rubber
- Origin:Imported
Our verdict“Choose the Gel-Excite 11 for comfortable everyday runs and walks, not for a hard-wearing shoe built around demanding training.”
ASICS Men’s Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes
Among these options, the Gel-Nimbus 27 is the comfort-led pick for runners who want substantial cushioning and value recycled materials in the upper. Its PureGEL and FF BLAST PLUS ECO setup is designed to soften landings while keeping cushioning light and responsive, making it a more cushioned proposition than the Gel-Excite 11. A breathable recycled jacquard mesh upper adds comfort without relying on a conventional all-new-materials story. This model suits steady runs where easy landings matter more than a distinctly energetic, trampoline-like feel; the NOVABLAST 5 is the clearer alternative for that livelier character. The tradeoff is the focus on cushioning rather than a specified durability advantage for intense training. Buyers prioritizing a simpler everyday option may also find the Gel-Excite 11 a more direct fit.
Pros:- PureGEL and FF BLAST PLUS ECO cushioning target soft, lightweight landings
- Recycled jacquard mesh upper combines breathability with recycled materials
- Cushioning is positioned as both supportive and responsive
- Rubber sole provides a defined outsole material
Cons:- No supplied information establishes durability for intense training
- Less clearly suited to a trampoline-like, energetic ride than the NOVABLAST 5
Best for: Men who prioritize a highly cushioned feel for regular runs and prefer a breathable upper made with recycled materials.
Not ideal for: Runners looking for a distinctly springy, energetic ride or a shoe described as suited to intense training; compare the NOVABLAST 5 for a more lively cushioning concept.
- Cushioning technology:PureGEL, FF BLAST PLUS ECO
- Upper material:Recycled jacquard mesh
- Fabric type:100% synthetic
- Outer material:Polyester
- Sole material:Rubber
- Origin:Imported
Our verdict“Pick the Gel-Nimbus 27 if plush landings and recycled upper materials matter more than a distinctly springy ride.”
ASICS Women’s Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes
The Gel-Cumulus 27 stands apart from the Gel-Excite 11 by pairing impact-softening cushioning with a more explicitly responsive setup. FF BLAST PLUS and PureGEL target comfortable landings, while the FLUIDRIDE outsole is designed to promote smoother strides. That combination makes this a good choice for women who want cushioning but do not want the shoe’s identity to stop at softness. Its engineered mesh upper supports breathability, and reflective details help when running in low light. Compared with the Gel-Nimbus 27, this option foregrounds stride flow and rebound rather than recycled upper materials and plush comfort. The tradeoff is that the provided details do not establish a durability advantage for intense training, so runners focused on rugged, heavy use should weigh that limitation.
Pros:- FF BLAST PLUS and PureGEL combine cushioning with rebound
- FLUIDRIDE outsole is designed to promote smoother strides
- Engineered mesh upper supports breathability
- Reflective details assist with low-light visibility
Cons:- May be less durable under intense training
- No supplied information identifies recycled materials in the upper
Best for: Women seeking cushioned everyday running shoes with a smoother-feeling stride and responsive rebound.
Not ideal for: Runners prioritizing recycled upper materials or a comfort-first plush feel; the Gel-Nimbus 27 better matches those preferences.
- Technology:FF BLAST PLUS, PureGEL
- Upper:Engineered mesh
- Outsole:FLUIDRIDE
- Reflective details:Yes
- Inner material:Polyester
- Outer material:Synthetic fiber
- Sole material:Rubber
- Origin:Imported
Our verdict“Choose the Gel-Cumulus 27 for cushioned runs where a smoother stride and responsive feel matter more than recycled-material details.”
ASICS Women’s Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes
This Gel-Excite 11 is another comfort-first option, but its product details call out an engineered mesh upper and explicitly list reflective details. Paired with PureGEL, AMPLIFOAM PLUS, and an OrthoLite X-30 sockliner, those features suit easy runs or walking when ventilation and a cushioned feel take priority. It shares its core cushioning platform with the other Gel-Excite 11 in this roundup, so the choice between them is less about a different ride and more about the listed construction: this version specifies a polyurethane outer material, while the other lists synthetic fiber. Compared with the Gel-Cumulus 27, it offers a simpler cushioning setup, not the same stated FF BLAST PLUS and FLUIDRIDE combination. Softer cushioning may feel short on support for some runners, and heavy outdoor use could expose durability limits.
Pros:- PureGEL and AMPLIFOAM PLUS provide a soft cushioning combination
- Engineered mesh upper is described as breathable
- OrthoLite X-30 sockliner supports moisture management
- Reflective details are specified for low-light visibility
Cons:- Soft cushioning may not provide enough support for some runners
- May be less durable for heavy outdoor use
- Does not list the Gel-Cumulus 27’s FF BLAST PLUS and FLUIDRIDE features
Best for: Women wanting a breathable, comfort-oriented shoe for easy running and walking, especially when reflective details and moisture management are useful.
Not ideal for: Runners needing firm-feeling support or a shoe for heavy outdoor training; the Gel-Cumulus 27 offers a more explicitly responsive setup.
- Technology:PureGEL, AMPLIFOAM PLUS
- Upper:Engineered mesh
- Sockliner:OrthoLite X-30
- Reflective details:Yes
- Outer material:Polyurethane (PU)
- Inner material:Mesh
- Sole material:Rubber
- Origin:Imported
Our verdict“This Gel-Excite 11 suits easy runs and daily wear if you favor ventilation and softness over firmer support or a more responsive setup.”
ASICS Men’s NOVABLAST 5 Running Shoes
The NOVABLAST 5 EKIDEN is the liveliest-feeling concept in this group: its FF BLAST MAX cushioning and trampoline-inspired outsole are designed to create an energized, responsive ride. That makes it a better match than the Gel-Nimbus 27 for runners who want cushioning to feel springy rather than primarily plush. The engineered mesh upper supports airflow, and recycled materials and reflective details add practical touches for regular runs. An AHAR LO rubber outsole is specified, though the supplied details do not establish how it compares in longevity with the other models. One fit drawback is clear: it runs large, so sizing may need adjustment. Buyers who prefer the straightforward, softer everyday character of the Gel-Excite 11 may find this more dynamic ride unnecessary.
Pros:- FF BLAST MAX cushioning supports a soft, energized ride
- Trampoline-inspired outsole is designed for responsiveness
- Breathable engineered mesh upper
- Reflective details and recycled materials are specified
Cons:- Runs large, so sizing may need adjustment
- No weight specification is provided
- Supplied details do not establish durability for intense training
Best for: Men seeking a springy, responsive running shoe for workouts or regular runs and willing to check sizing carefully.
Not ideal for: Runners who prefer a simple soft-cushioning feel or want a fit that does not require sizing adjustment; the Gel-Excite 11 is the more straightforward comfort-led alternative.
- Midsole:FF BLAST MAX cushioning
- Outsole:AHAR LO rubber
- Upper material:Synthetic fiber
- Lining material:Polyester
- Sole material:Rubber
- Design features:Tongue wing construction, reflective details, recycled materials
- Weight:Not specified
- Country of origin:Imported
Our verdict“Choose the NOVABLAST 5 if a lively, springy ride is your priority and you are prepared to check the fit carefully.”
How We Picked
I compared the lineup around the decisions runners actually face: intended surface, cushioning character, stability, day-to-day versatility, and how specialized each shoe is. I gave more weight to a model’s ability to suit its intended runner than to headline features alone; a trail shoe should be judged as a trail option, not as a road trainer, and a stability shoe should not be treated as a default upgrade for everyone.
The ranking favors broad usefulness first, then clearer specialist roles and simpler entry-level choices. That puts the Gel-Nimbus 27 at the top for its cushioned road-running role, with the NOVABLAST 5 and Gel-Kayano 32 standing out for distinct ride preferences. The Gel-Excite 11, Gel-Contend 10, and Gel-Venture 11 rank around accessible daily use or a specific surface need. Repeated men’s and women’s listings are treated as fit-and-sizing variants of the same model, not as separate designs with different performance claims.
| asics running shoe | Upper | Inner material | Outer material |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASICS Women’s Gel-Nimbus 27 Ru | Engineered jacquard mesh | Polyester | — |
| ASICS Men’s Gel-Venture 11 Tra | Mesh | — | — |
| ASICS Men’s Gel-Nimbus 27 Runn | Engineered jacquard mesh | Polyester and ethylene vinyl acetate | — |
| ASICS Men’s Gel-Excite 11 Runn | Engineered mesh | Polyester | — |
| ASICS Women’s Gel-Nimbus 27 Ru | Engineered jacquard mesh | Polyester | Mesh |
| ASICS Women’s NOVABLAST 5 Runn | Breathable jacquard mesh | Polyester | Synthetic fiber |
| ASICS Women’s Glideride Max Ru | Breathable engineered mesh | — | Polyurethane (PU) |
| ASICS Women’s Gel-Kayano 32 Ru | Lightweight, breathable engineered mesh | — | — |
| ASICS Men’s Gel-Kayano 32 Runn | Engineered mesh | Polyester | Synthetic fiber |
| ASICS Men’s Gel-Contend 10 Run | Engineered mesh | Polyester | Synthetic fiber |
| ASICS Women’s Gel-Excite 11 Ru | — | Mesh | Synthetic fiber |
| ASICS Men’s Gel-Nimbus 27 Runn | — | — | Polyester |
| ASICS Women’s Gel-Cumulus 27 R | Engineered mesh | Polyester | Synthetic fiber |
| ASICS Women’s Gel-Excite 11 Ru | Engineered mesh | Mesh | Polyurethane (PU) |
| ASICS Men’s NOVABLAST 5 Runnin | — | — | — |
Factors to Consider When Choosing Asics Running Shoes
Before choosing among ASICS running shoes, decide what job the shoe needs to do and how its feel matches your preferences. A model name or feature label cannot substitute for surface, fit, and ride priorities.
Choose the surface before the cushioning
Start with where most of your miles happen: paved roads, treadmills, or uneven trails. A road shoe can feel out of place on loose ground, while a trail-focused outsole may be unnecessary for smooth pavement. If your routes vary, decide which surface accounts for most of your running rather than buying one shoe to excel everywhere. The Gel-Venture 11 is the lineup’s off-road choice; the Nimbus, NOVABLAST, Kayano, Cumulus, Excite, and Contend are road-oriented options. A common mistake is choosing by cushioning alone and overlooking whether the outsole and overall design suit the route.
Match cushioning to your preferred ride
More cushioning is not automatically more comfortable for every runner. Plush shoes such as the Gel-Nimbus 27 emphasize a protected feel, while the NOVABLAST 5 is the better fit for someone who wants a livelier response. A more moderate or straightforward shoe can feel easier to manage for short runs and everyday errands. Think about whether you prefer a soft landing, a springier sensation, or a less elaborate ride before prioritizing cushioning. If possible, try shoes late in the day with your usual running socks, since foot size can change over the course of a day. Do not assume the softest option will be the best match for your stride or routine.
Buy stability for a reason, not as insurance
The Gel-Kayano 32 is the lineup’s support-focused choice, but runners do not need a stability shoe simply because they are new or run long distances. Consider whether you prefer a guided, structured feel and whether that sensation remains comfortable through your usual run. A neutral shoe may feel less intrusive if you do not want added guidance. Stability features can change how a shoe feels, so avoid treating support labels as a diagnosis or a guarantee against injury. When uncertain, compare a supportive model with a neutral option in a running specialty shop or seek advice from a qualified professional. The right choice is the one that feels comfortable and appropriate for your own running.
Treat fit as a performance feature
A shoe that looks suitable on paper can still distract or irritate if the fit is wrong. Check for secure heel hold, enough room in front of the toes, and a midfoot that does not feel pinched. Men’s and women’s versions may have different size and fit options, so use the brand’s current sizing information rather than assuming a familiar number will fit identically. Do not size up automatically to create toe room if it makes the heel slip. Try both shoes and walk or jog briefly if a retailer allows it. Prioritize a comfortable fit over choosing a model because it is popular or has a feature you may not need.
Pay more for a clear benefit, not a longer feature list
A premium-positioned shoe makes the most sense when its ride or support solves a real preference for your training. The Nimbus, NOVABLAST, and Kayano each serve different priorities, so a higher level of cushioning or structure is only worthwhile if you value that feel. Runners building a simple routine may find the Gel-Excite 11 or Gel-Contend 10 more fitting than a more specialized shoe. Compare the entire purpose of each model, not just its name or a single cushioning term. If you run occasionally, an uncomplicated option may be easier to justify; if you train often, comfort across your regular routes may matter more. Avoid paying for a feature that does not improve the runs you actually do.
Choose around your training week, not one idealized run
Think about the range of runs the shoe will cover: short easy outings, longer steady miles, faster sessions, or mixed routes. One versatile daily trainer can be a sensible starting point, while runners with distinct training needs may prefer different shoes for different sessions. The NOVABLAST 5 offers a livelier road-running alternative to the plush Nimbus, and the Kayano fills a support-oriented role rather than trying to serve every runner. Do not buy a specialist model just because you hope to add a new workout later. Begin with your current routine and the surfaces you use most, then decide whether a second shoe would add a useful difference. This keeps the choice grounded in your actual mileage and preferences.
Frequently Asked Questions
Should I choose the Gel-Nimbus 27 or NOVABLAST 5 for everyday road running?
Choose the Gel-Nimbus 27 if you value a more cushioned, protective feel, and the NOVABLAST 5 if you want a livelier ride for regular road runs. Neither is the automatic choice for every runner; comfort and preferred response matter more than a shoe’s reputation. Consider the pace and length of your typical runs, then compare how each feels at an easy jogging speed. If you want one shoe for relaxed mileage, prioritize the sensation you find comfortable after several minutes, not just the first step. Their main difference is ride character, not a simple good-versus-better ranking.
Do I need the Gel-Kayano 32 if I overpronate?
Overpronation alone does not make the Gel-Kayano 32 mandatory. It is the support-focused model in this roundup, so it may appeal if you prefer a more guided, structured ride. Some runners with pronation prefer neutral shoes, and labels do not tell the whole story about comfort. Try a supportive option alongside a neutral shoe if you can, paying attention to whether the shoe feels natural through your stride. For persistent pain or concerns about your gait, consult a qualified clinician rather than relying on a shoe category to diagnose or treat a problem.
Can I use the Gel-Venture 11 for road running as well as trails?
The Gel-Venture 11 is the trail-specific option here, so it makes the most sense when off-road grip and uneven routes are a regular part of your running. It may handle some hard-packed paths, but road-focused models are a more natural starting point for runners whose miles are mostly on pavement. Think about the surfaces you use most rather than choosing a trail shoe for occasional dirt sections alone. If your routes mix smooth roads and rough trails frequently, compare how the outsole and underfoot feel work on both. A shoe that suits the majority of your runs is usually the more useful first purchase.
Are the Gel-Excite 11 and Gel-Contend 10 good choices for a first pair of running shoes?
They are the lineup’s straightforward road-running choices and can suit beginners who want a less specialized shoe. The Gel-Excite 11 and Gel-Contend 10 should still be chosen by fit and feel, not simply because a shoe is described as an entry-level model. Compare them with the more cushioned Nimbus if you know you prefer extra softness, or with the NOVABLAST if you want a livelier ride. New runners often make the mistake of buying more support or cushioning than they enjoy. A comfortable fit for your intended routes matters more than picking the most advanced model.
Do the men’s and women’s versions of the same ASICS model run differently?
The repeated listings in this roundup are men’s and women’s versions of the same named models, rather than separate model designs with different roles. The practical differences for a buyer are the available size and fit options, so use the current brand sizing chart and try the shoe where possible. Do not assume that converting a size number alone will produce the same fit. Check heel security, midfoot comfort, and toe room in the version you plan to buy. If one version fits your foot more comfortably and is available in your size, that fit should guide your decision.
Conclusion
For the broadest cushioned road-running recommendation, I’d choose the Gel-Nimbus 27 as best overall. The Gel-Excite 11 is my best value-style pick for runners seeking a simpler daily road shoe, while the Gel-Nimbus 27 also earns the best premium nod for buyers who specifically want plush cushioning. Beginners should compare the Gel-Excite 11 and Gel-Contend 10 for a straightforward start, then choose by fit and feel. For a livelier daily run, look at the NOVABLAST 5; for added guidance, the Gel-Kayano 32; and for trails, the Gel-Venture 11. Choose the model that matches your routes and preferred ride rather than paying for features you will not use.
Fall Picks
fall essentials
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
